10 Kingdoms – The Abolition of Sovereignty
Rationalization
Did you know that the European Union was an experiment that had long been planned by those behind a one world government. The idea being that if the European Unionproved the success of political and economic integration then this model could be repeated across other world regions. Now we have the Africa Union and the coming North American Union. Other regions are still at the economic union only
stage but it is much easier to start off with economic union followed by political union rather than the other way around. One should also not be fooled by the present chaos in Europe as this is part of the agenda for tightening political and economic unity known as the Hegelian concept, the principle of creating
the chaos necessary to justify the changes needed for a required end.
This weeks report takes a look at the ongoing progression of what is known as the Club of Rome
Model. A plot to destroy the sovereignty of individual and independent nations and replace it with
a form of governance in which the power to create and enforce laws across all of the countries in
the world will reside with just ten committees. If those committees elect a leader then one could
take this further and say ten leaders.
The relevance of this is because of the prophecy of John in Revelation 17.
“The ten horns you saw are ten kings who have not yet received a kingdom, but who for one hour
will receive authority as kings along with the beast. They have one purpose and will give their
power and authority to the beast. They will wage war against the Lamb, but the Lamb will triumph
over them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings—and with him will be his called, chosen
and faithful followers.” Revelation 17:12-13
- THE SEEDS OF REGIONALIZATION
- A SPIRITUAL MOTIVATION FOR CHANGE
- THE CLUB OF ROME REGIONAL MODEL
- THE PROPHETICAL MEANING OF TEN
- THE NEW WORLD ORDER WILL FAIL
- ADDITIONAL SUPPORT MATERIAL
THE SEEDS OF REGIONALIZATION
The Outline of the Post-War New World Map was a map created and self-published by Maurice Gomberg of Philadelphia PA, on February 25, 1942 after the attack on Pearl Harbor and the entry of the U.S.A. into World War II.It shows a proposed political division of the world after World War II in the event of an Allied victory in which the United States of America, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union would rule. The map includes a manifesto describing a “New World Moral Order”, along with quotes from Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms speech.
Gomberg created the map as a personal project, and little else is known of him. The map has been
highlighted by scholars as the initial beginning of the world community regionalization model in which the world would be divided up into bioregions with an economic and political association.
After the Axis powers would have been destroyed, the Soviet Union, U.S.A. and United Kingdom would assure the institution of a new world order that would lead to a permanent peace (pax Americana) and the freedom would be a result of the war led by the allies.
For reasons regarding historical matters, economic organizing and geographic (continental)
neighbourhood, the U.S.A. should have taken the deliberate role of world leader and establish the new
democratic world order.
The project regarded the demilitarization of several countries, the submission of those countries to an
international control and including them into political unions and international organizations.
All of the states would have to obey common economical (global) rules, but the U.S.A. would
oversee the adherence to political freedoms. The plan would consist of:
Controlling at a global level the world’s natural wealth for the purpose of assuring equal access and
distribution for all the countries;
Controlling at a global level the bank institutions, the financial international organizations and the
foreign investments;
Controlling at a federal and regional level the external relations and the international trade
practiced by the member states.
The countries all over the world would have to become part of the regional or continental forms of
association, political unions of states, mostly federations. The states or union of states would
become also members of the United Nations Organization. This Organization would have to have
social, economic and military institutions of its own, with the help of which it would be able to intervene anywhere in the world to re-establish peace and democracy.
The shocking matter regarding this map is that it appears to anticipate with about seven decades the
phenomena of a state association trend that is happening in the present days or are planned at a
political level to happen in 10-20 years. In fact, the project regards the creation of a world map of
political union states that are to be organized at a continental level (continental unions). In Asia, where
the civilization diversity is greater that average, the organization is to be done at a sub continental level(regional).
There would have been the following structures:
A North American Union of States as a dominant world power that would include the US, Canada,
all Central American and Caribbean states, most Atlantic islands (including Greenland and Iceland),
most Pacific islands, Taiwan, Hainan, the Philippines and several now Indonesian islands,
including Sulawesi. This was to be the dominant power in the world, military and otherwise.
A union of socialist republics led by Russia. The Soviet Union was to be rewarded with Persia (Iran),
Mongolia, Manchuria, Finland, and all of Eastern Europe, which subsequently would form part of the
Eastern Bloc (excluding Albania, but including the real-life maverick state of Yugoslavia, socialist but
anti-Soviet) . All of theses states were simply to become member-states of the USSR. Austria and
most of Germany, although ‘quarantined’ are shown within the Soviet sphere.
The United States of South America (USSA): including all South American states, as a single
constituent state and the Falkland Islands as part of the USSA.
The Union of African Republics (UAR): All of Africa as a federation of republics.
The Arabian Federated Republics (AFR): covering Saudi and all other states now occupying
the Arabian Peninsula, plus present-day Iraq and Syria.
The Federated Republics of India (FRI): Present day Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bhutan,
Bangladesh and Burma (Myanmar).
The United Republics of China (URC): A federation including all parts of present-day China,
Korea, the erstwhile French colony of Indochina (now Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia), Thailand and Malaya.
The United States of Scandinavia (USS): Norway, Sweden, Denmark.
The United States of Europe (USE): the Benelux countries, the German Rhineland, France,
Switzerland, Spain, Portugal and Italy.
And finally the British Commonwealth of Nations(BCN), including Great Britain,
Australia, New Zealand, Sri Lanka, Madagascar and most of Indonesia.
Smaller entities include Eire (the whole of Ireland), Greece (including Albania), Turkey (excluding
European Turkey), Hebrewland (the Holy Land plus Jordan) and Japan. The three axis states
(Germany, Italy and Japan) were to be ‘quarantined’ until they could be readmitted in the family of
nations.
“As the USA with the cooperation of the Democracies of Latin-America, the British
Commonwealth of Nations and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, assumes world leadership for
the establishment of a New World Moral Order for permanent peace, justice, security and world
reconstruction.”
This proposal regarding a division of the world after the end of world War II was not immediately put into practice as the suggestion was considered to be contrary to the interest of U.S.A), the Soviet Union and against the wishes of United Kingdom, France, Portugal, Netherlands and others to keep their colonial domains.
A SPIRITUAL MOTIVATION FOR CHANGE
Whilst writing in her book, “The Externalisation of the Hierarchy”, inNovember, 1939 – Alice Bailey’s Guiding Spirit supposedly began to address
to her the ‘Economic Problem’.
“There are adequate resources for the sustenance of human life, and these science can increase and develop… Man is the controller of it all, and they belong to everyone and are the property of no one group, nation, or race. It is solely due to man’s selfishness that…thousands are starving whilst food is rotting or destroyed; it is solely due to the grasping schemes and the financial injustices of man’s making that the resources of the planet are not universally available under some wisesystem of distribution.”
In 1981, New Age leader Jeremy Rifkin proposed a new level of wealth redistribution in a book entitled, “Entropy: A New World View”. In this book, Rifkin argues that the world is using too many resources to create too many material things. Even though the New Age believes no energy is ever lost, that it is merely converted from one form of energy into another, Rifkin is proposing that when the energy is used the first time, it is weakened so that its subsequent use is less effective than its original
use. Rifkin explains his view. “A human being, a skyscraper, an automobile, and a blade of grass all
represent energy transformed from one state to another…the energy they embody doesn’t disappear. It
is merely transferred back somewhere else into the environment.”
However, Rifkin says that this transferred energy is weakened each time it is transferred, so that, finally, it is “no longer capable of conversion into work…Energy can only be transferred to a dissipated state.”
Therefore, Rifkin believes the world is currently producing too many material things that originally use too many resources. If the world is not to soon find itself in a position of running out of usable energy, Rifkin proposes that we must change our lifestyle dramatically. We must move into a State run economy that would regulate the production of all material things so the world will not run out of usable energy. This lifestyle is called “Low Entropy”. This change, says Rifkin, will require a radical “new world view”, and he urges draconian measures to achieve this new thinking. He says,
“The radical change in world view required to make this transition will have to be accomplished overnight.“Avatars [World Teachers, like Antichrist will be] frequently create crises in order to bring an end to the old and the undesirable and make way for new and more suitable forms for the evolving life of God Immanent in Nature.”
There will be no time for polite debate, subtle compromise, or monetary equivocation. To succeed will require a zealous determination, a militancy, if you will, of Herculean proportions.” (Ibid, p.186, Emphasis added)
“Today, in the midst of this devastated, chaotic, and unhappy world, mankind has a fresh opportunity to reject selfish, materialistic living and to begin to tread the Lighted Way. The moment that humanity shows its willingness to do this, then the Christ will come …Before Christ could come with his disciples, our present civilization had to die.” ["Reappearance of the Christ", by Foster Bailey, p. 21-23]The key statement? They “frequently create crises in order to bring an end to the old and the undesirable”.
This is the ultimate goal of the Illuminati as they attempt to use the weapon of “regionalization” to strip countries of their own autonomy destroying the idea of sovereign states paving the way for a world map where the boundaries are blurred and where the rights to change and enforce laws on countries are reserved for heads of geographical regional blocs.
This thus leads us to the Club of Rome one of the secret deadly weapons being used to bring about this change. [Emphasis added]
THE CLUB OF ROME REGIONAL MODEL
The Club of Rome is a global think tank that deals with a variety of international political issues.
It was founded in April 1968 and raised considerable public attention in 1972 with its report
Limits to Growth. The Club is composed of “scientists, economists, businessmen, international high civil servants, heads of state and former heads of state from all five continents who are convinced that the future of humankind is not determined once and for all and that each human being can contribute to the improvement of our societies.”
The Club of Rome consists of members of the so called Black Nobility of Europe, old families which lived in Venice and Genoa. These people have ruled vast financial empires for the past fifteen hundred years.
‘They are called the ‘Black’ nobility because of their constant use of dirty tricks, terrorism and unethical methods.
On September 17, 1973, they released a Report called the “Regionalized and Adaptive Model of the Global World System” which was prepared by Directors Mihajlo Mesarovic and Eduard Pestel as part of the “Strategy for Survival Project”. This revealed the Club’s goal of dividing the world into ten political/economic (both) regions restructured drastically into a ‘horizontal system’ which would
involve interdependent ‘world regions’. The ten regions would unite the entire world under a single form of government.
The idea is now coming to life in the United Nations as regions begin to form economic
blocks loosely modelled after the European Union. Since the time of this map, Mexico
has been added to the North American region (1) as part of the coming creation of the controversial American Union and Israel is supposed to be aligned with region number (4). These regions are: North America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Japan,
Rest of Developed World, Latin America, Middle East, Rest of Africa, South and Southeast Asia, and China. The same plan was published in a Club of Rome book called Mankind at the Turning Point.
As part of this concept provisions would be made to investigate any individual country or sub region in the context of regional global development. The model has been developed up to the stage where it can be used for policy analysis related to a number of critical issues such as: energy resources utilization and technology assessment; food demand and production; population growth and the affect of timing of birth control programs;
reduction of inequities in regional economic developments; depletion dynamics of certain
resources, particularly oil reserves; phosphorus use as fertilizer; regional unemployment; constraints on growth due to labor, energy export limitation.
THE EUROPEAN UNION
The European Union is a political, social and economic regional organization, having 27 member
states as it consist in a form of pan European unity. The result from its political and economical treaties reflects, through its structure, the democratic principle of the state power separation in: legislative power, executive power and juridical power, and regarding the legislative process, it following the principles of subsidiary and proportionality. According to Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union, as it has been revised by the other treaties, the integrative organization has communitarian institutions. These are:
The European Parliament that represents the European Union citizens, at they elect its members
trough direct vote.
The Council of the European Union (Council of Ministers) that represents each member state.
The European Commission, that represents the general interests of the E.U.
The Court of Justice for the European community, that watches over the abidance of the European
legislation.
Currently, the Union is in an expanding process as other three countries — Croatia, The Republic of
Macedonia, and Turkey are candidate in acceding at the membership of the European Union
Because of the religious and cultural differences in comparison with the rest of the Europe, Turkey
confronts itself with a powerful opposition from the conservatory and religious E.U. governments.
Croatia is another candidate state for adhering at the Union. This process has delayed by the non
cooperation of Croatia with The International Criminal Tribunal in Hague. At 9l of November
2005, The European Commission recommended the provision of the candidate state for Macedonia
that became the third ex-Yugoslavic country to receive this statute.
Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway are members of the European Economic Space (SEE/EEA) and this allows them to participate in most of the aspects regarding the single market of the E.U., without the obligation to adhere.
Switzerland, which is the forth EFTA state has rejected the participation at EEA trough a
referendum, yet it has signed several bilateral treaties with similar effects.
THE EDITERRANEAN UNION
Union for the Mediterranean (UfM) is a multilateral partnership that encompasses 43 countries from
Europe and the Mediterranean Basin: the 27 member states of the European Union and 16
Mediterranean partner countries from North Africa, the Middle East and the Balkans. It was created in July 2008 as a re-launched Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (the Barcelona Process), when a plan to create an autonomous Mediterranean Union was dropped. The Union has the aim of promoting stability and prosperity throughout the Mediterranean region. Nevertheless, its 2009 and 2010 Summits could not be held due to the stalemate of the Arab-Israeli peace process after the Gaza war. The Union for the Mediterranean introduced new institutions into the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership with the aim of increasing its visibility such as the creation of a Secretariat. The commercial connections between the European countries and the African ones are very important. They have created the premises for a future economic union between the Mediterranean non European states and the communitarian countries. The Mediterranean Union reunites countries from Europe, Middle Est. and North Africa countries that have access to the Mediterranean Sea, forming an economic community by taking the model of the early European Union. As it would be formed by the E.U. states and the Mediterranean countries, the Mediterranean Union would have a State President Council, an executive council, ministerial councils, a Permanent
Commission that would act like a Secretary Department, a consolidated Parliament reunion and
its own bank. Such an organization could have a big role in the area in solving diverse problems, form
ecological issues to immigration.
From the European Union side: the 27 European Union member states (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria,
Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary,
Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and United Kingdom.)
From the side of the Mediterranean Partner countries: Albania, Algeria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Mauritania, Monaco, Montenegro, Morocco, the Palestinian Authority, Syria (self suspended on 22 June 2011), Tunisia and Turkey.
Libya as an observer state.
De-pollution of the Mediterranean. This broad project encompasses many initiatives that target
good environmental governance, access to drinkable water, water management, pollution
reduction and protection of the Mediterranean biodiversity.
Maritime and land highways. The purpose of this project is to increase and improve the circulation of commodities and people throughout the Euro-Mediterranean region by improving its ports, and
building highways and railways. Specifically, the Paris and Marseilles Declarations refer to the
construction of both a Trans-Maghrebi railway and highway systems, connecting Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia.
Civil protection. The civil protection project aims at improving the prevention, preparedness and
response to both natural and man-made disasters. The ultimate goal is to “bring the Mediterranean
Partner Countries progressively closer to the European Civil Protection Mechanism.
Alternative energies: Mediterranean solar plan. The goal of this project is to promote the production
and use of renewable energies. More specifically, it aims at turning the Mediterranean partner countries into producers of solar energy and then circulating the resulting electricity through the Euro-
Mediterranean region.
Higher education and research: On June 2008 the Euro-Mediterranean University was inaugurated
in Piran (Slovenia), which offers graduate studies programs. The Foreign Ministers gathered at
Marseilles on 2008 also called for the creation of another Euro-Mediterranean University in Fes,
Morocco. At the Paris summit, the 43 Heads of State and Government agreed that the goal of this
project is to promote higher education and scientific research in the Mediterranean, as well as to
establish in the future a “Euro-Mediterranean Higher Education, Science and Research Area.”
THE AFRICAN UNION
This is the organization that follows The Union of African Unity. Founded in July 2002, the entity was
created after the E.U. model, having the promotion of democracy, human right and development of
Africa as goals, especially increasing the level of foreign investments trough The New Partnership for
Africa Development programme (NEPAD) .
Elected in 2004, The Pan African Parliament opened in March 2004, initially having its
headquarters in Addis Ababa, in Ethiopia. It is currently having its headquarters in Midland, South
Africa.
Initially, the Pan African Parliament only had a consultative role, but now it also has legislative
powers. It has 265 members that are also members of the national Parliament of the 53 African states.
The African Union has its own army (that has intervened as a peace force in the regional conflicts,
like the one in Darfur or the one in Somalia), a single Bank (The African Development Bank), a
Court of Justice (The African Court of Justice). The Union’s institutions are currently planning upon
issuing a unique currency named AFRO.
Several African leaders are sustaining the idea of creating out of the African Union a state federation
called The United States of Africa.
During a speech at Accra-Ghana in 2007, the president of the Republic of Zimbabwe, Robert
Mugabe stated that the African countries should help each other, instead of relying on the
international aids.
“If we don’t organize in putting our resources together, and we do have many resources, we will never prosper, no matter the external help”,One of the main supporters of the African union, the now deceased ex Libyan leader Muammar al-
Gaddafi along with Laurent Gbagbo, the president of Ivory Coast and Guillaume Soro, the Ivorian
prime minister, launched in 2007, during a meeting, a call for the African people to unite in one single
state and to put an end to civil wars, a call that was quoted by AFP.
“We have to build a strong state, with a single government, a single 2 million soldiers army, a single currency, a single African identity, a single passport”, stated Ghaddafi in front in 5000 persons gathered in a hall in Abidjan.The African leaders summit in Ghana ended only with the creation of a Committee mend to establish
a project and a calendar for the future Continental Union Government that should be established by
2015.
The idea dates back 50 years ago, as it has originally been issued by Kwame Nkrumak after the
gaining of Ghana’s independence.
THE UNION OF SOUTH AMERICAN NATIONS
The forming treaty of U.N.A.S.U.R. was signed on 23 of May 2008. It provides the creation of a unique currency, the creation of a central bank (the Bank of South) and of a South American Parliament in a new union capital, Quito, Ecuador. The former secretary general of The Andes Community, Allan Wagner Tizon, announced that the deadline for the integration process to be finalized is 2019.
The Union of South American Nations begun the integration plans by:
Constructing an access way between Brazil and Peru via Bolivia. As a result, Brazil will have access to the Pacific Ocean and Peru to Atlantic Ocean.
The construction begun in September 2005, being financed by Brazil 60% and Peru 40%.
Constructing The South American Energy Ring, a pipeline trough which Argentina, Brazil, Chile,
Paraguay and Uruguay will receive natural Peruvian gas. The Proposal was approved and the
construction begun in 2006.
Constructing bi-national gas product, a project designed for the energetic integration of Columbia
and Venezuela. The construction begun in mid 2006. The beneficiary of the project will be PDVSA
The national oil company from Venezuela. This project will cost over 300,000,000 USD.
The South American nations will also form a single military alliance for the first time. This new institution of The Union of South American Nations, The Council of Defense, is designed as an integration dialog and defense cooperation mechanism for the 12 Union states. Brazil’s president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva insisted upon creating this institution after the conflict between Columbia and Ecuador. Among the objectives of this new military institutions will be the increasing of military cooperation; humanitarian missions and peace operation coordonance.
THE SLAVIC UNION
established by 2 treaties: Russia — Belarus Treaty (signed in Minsk, on in April 1997) and The Slave
Union Treaty (signed in Moscow on 8th of December 1999). The component countries keep
their suveranity Serbia is also part of this structure since 1999 and its participation was confirmed in 2003 and 2006.
South Osetia and Adhazia are part of this Union, even though they aren’t well known countries at an
international level. Both states have adhered in 2008 — 2009. Among other candidates there are
Transnistria, Kazakhstan in 2010 and Kyrgyzstan.
THE GULF COOPERATION COUNCIL
This is an international organization that formed a commercial community counting 6 Arab states:
Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates. The state community hardly
receives any new members. Still, Yemen is expected to join the Arab community in 2016.
The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) consists of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates. It is generally dominated by Saudi Arabia, which is the largest and most prominent member-state with the biggest oil reserves. As part of globalisation, the GCC is a form of economic integration on the Arab Peninsula. Since 1981 it has moved to a customs union with
joint-armed forces and there is now talk of a monetary union. The GCC being the heart of
capitalism in the Middle East, itself a huge investor in the global economy with a prominent place in global finance as well as the oil trade. All of these states have a tacit alliance with Israel. Gaddafi has
dubbed the council the “Gulf Uncooperative Council” as it recently sided with the US against
him. The GCC is actively involved in the exportation of oil from the rebel-controlled east of the country.
The GCC organised the recent summit in Qatar and has been supplying the Libyan rebels with arms.
US interests in the region rely on the ability of the GCC to repress opposition in countries like Bahrain.
With Saudi Arabia in the lead, the Peninsula Shield Force, the military wing of the GCC has intervened against the uprising in Bahrain with the supposed aim of protecting the country and it’s military infrastructure from “foreign interference”. Officially, the fear is that the Shi’ite population might be trying to establish an Islamic state in the Gulf modelled on Iran. Interestingly, the GCC was formed in an effort by these countries to insulate themselves from the conflict between Iran and Iraq. Though the GCC supported Saddam Hussein against Ayatollah Khomeini for fear of that the “Islamic Revolution” could spread. In such a scenario the precious oil fields could be threatened, as the people living on the land are predominantly Shi’ite Muslim. When Iraq attempted to annex Kuwait in 1990 the GCC immediately made moves to ostracise Iraq and went on to participate in the Persian Gulf War against Iraq.
THE SOUTH ASIAN ASSOCIATION
The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) is a political economic
organization that had in 1995, 7 Asian members: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal,
Maldives and Bhutan. Since 2007, at the 14th Organization Summit, Afghanistan became the
eighth member.
For the past 63 years – the life span of most countries of this region, South Asia has remained in
a state of tension. The eight SAARC countries* that make up this geopolitically sensitive region, where a
major chunk of the humanity lives, do not enjoy the kind of friendly and harmonious relationship with
each other, as one would have expected. This despite efforts of some well meaning leaders like
General Irshad, former Bangladeshi president, who tried to bring the people and the countries together
on a single platform of South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation on the pattern of the
European Union to help develop the region into a major economic and political bloc.
The organization’s cohesion and its role in Asia are questioned by the military rivalry between India and Pakistan.
This conflict represents the cause for which an Asian Union is impossible to conceive in the area, in
spite of the existing dream regarding one big India. Still, the Trade Agreement came into force on the
1st of January 2006.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH EAST ASIA
This association known as ASEAN is a geopolitical and economic organization composed of ten
countries in South East Asia. It was originally formed in August 1967 by Indonesia, Malaysia,
Philippines, Singapore and Thailand.
The Organization is supporting the economic development of the member countries and also their social development. ASEAN as an economic community is planned for creation in 2020 and is supposed to have some resemblance to the European Union, because it should have the three
fundamentals of freedom of movement between countries regarding goods, people and capital.
The single market should number over 530 million persons from the ten states: Malaysia, Indonesia,
Singapore, Brunei, Thailand, Philippines, Vietnam, Laos, Myanmar (Burma) and Cambodia.
THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION
The North American Union (NAU) is a proposed international government encompassing the nations
of Canada, the United States, and Mexico. It could be considered the North American analogue of the European Union. The blueprint for this governing body was laid out in a 2005 report entitled “Building a North American Community” published by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), an American foreign policy think tank, with input from the Canadian Council of Chief Executives and the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales.
The belief that a North American Union with a single currency known as the Amero was being planned and implemented in secret became widespread, so much so that the NAU was a topic of debate during the 2008 American presidential campaigns and the subject of various U.S. Congressional resolutions designed to thwart its implementation.
Prominent critics such as CNN’s Lou Dobbs and Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul
denounced the concept, joined by left-wing nationalist groups in Canada, Internet blogs, and
widely viewed videos and films such as Zeitgeist”.
Jerome Corsi’s 2007 book “The Late Great USA: The Coming Merger with Mexico and Canada” also helped bring the NAU discussion into the mainstream. Others who dismiss these beliefs
maintain they are the latest example of a long line of erroneous conspiracy theories which suggest that the United States’ sovereignty is being eroded by a secret cabal of foreign and domestic players.
ASIA PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION
Development of the Asia Pacific Union has also begun in earnest. In December 2008, then
Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd suggested that Asia and Pacific countries, including the
region’s heavyweights such as China, India and Japan, form a regional bloc similar to the European
Union.
“The key thing is to enhance security and regional co-operation, which at present is fragmented,”He argued that an “Asia-Pacific Community” could be founded by 2020 as a forum for tackling climate change and terrorism, as well as settling territorial conflicts, such as over Kashmir, the Taiwan Straits and the Korean peninsula. Furthermore, it could serve as a trade platform to help exploit the benefits of the looming economic power of the region, which he thinks will be “at the centre of global affairs” throughout this century. He says,
“Put simply, global economic and strategic weight is shifting to Asia,”Before Rudd left office in 2010 he has experienced a number of challenges because of the fact that
many of the asian countries already belong to their own regional unions of which many do not facilitate close facilitate close integration with the U.S as Rudd has been pushing.
For now Australia has to be content with being a part of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation
which is a far looser arrangement.
The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) is a forum for 21 Pacific Rim countries (formally Member Economies) that seeks to promote free trade and economic cooperation throughout the Asia-Pacific region.
Established in 1989 in response to the growing interdependence of Asia-Pacific economies and the
advent of regional economic blocs (such as the European Union) in other parts of the world, APEC
works to raise living standards and education levels through sustainable economic growth and to foster
a sense of community and an appreciation of shared interests among Asia-Pacific countries.
Members account for approximately 40% of the world’s population, approximately 54% of the
world’s gross domestic product and about 44% of world trade.
An annual APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting is attended by the heads of government of all APEC
members except the Republic of China (Taiwan), which is represented under the name Chinese
Taipei by a ministerial-level official.
THE CARRIBEAN COMMUNITY
The Caribbean Community (CARICOM) is an organisation of 15 Caribbean nations and
dependencies. CARICOM’s main purposes are to promote economic integration and cooperation
among its members, to ensure that the benefits of integration are equitably shared, and to coordinate
foreign policy.
Its major activities involve coordinating economic policies and development planning; devising and
instituting special projects for the less-developed countries within its jurisdiction; operating as a
regional single market for many of its members (Caricom Single Market); and handling regional
trade disputes. The secretariat headquarters is based in Georgetown, Guyana.
THE ARAB LEAGUE
The Arab league unlike all the previous unions is not so much a commercial union as one which is
supposed to be more a united political voice.
Founded in March 1945, the League of Arab States (or Arab League) is a loose confederation of twenty-two Arab nations, including Palestine, whose broad mission is to improve coordination among its members on matters of common interest while preserving the sovereignty of its individual states.
The League was chartered in response to concerns about postwar colonial divisions of territory as well as strong opposition to the emergence of a Jewish state in Palestine. But it has long been criticized for ineffectiveness, disunity, and poor governance.
Critics also say it has traditionally been more representative of its various autocratic regimes than of Arab citizens.
Unrest across the Arab world in 2011 and a push for Palestinian statehood at the UN have presented the Arab League with fresh tests of relevance. Some critics see positive developments in the League’s actions in Libya, where it supported a no-fly zone and the ouster of Muammar al-Qaddafi and in Syria, where it called for an end to the crackdown of Bashar al-Assad’s regime. Shadi Hamid of the Brookings Institution says the Libya precedent shows the Arab League does have a role to play.
“Before that,” he adds, “No one was really sure what its raison d’être was. Now there is a need for a
collective body to address the various changes that are going on the in the region.” Still others say the
League’s actions represent little more than a gesture of public appeasement.
CONCLUSION
A continental union is an inter-governmental, supranational, or a federation of member states located in the same continent, or close to it. Continental unions are a relatively new type of political entity in
the history of human government. Throughout most of human history, political organization has been at the local level (i.e. tribal, city state) and in more recent centuries, the sub-regional (“regional”)/subcontinental level, however, starting with the advent of better transportation, weapons and communication there was for the first time the ability for a union of member states to organize at the continental level.
After the devastation of the first and second world wars in the middle of the 1900s Europe slowly
evolved from its founding as the “Coal and Steel Community” to become a political union covering
much of the European Continent (27 member states as of 2011. Seeking to follow in the foot steps of
the European Union, in 2002 and 2008 the African Union and Union of South American Nations
respectively, set down similar blueprints for integration into political and economic unions at the
continental level.
Other unions as we have seen are purely economic unions only or political unions only however the
concept of regionalization is something which we see at the heart of the Club of Rome model
because through regionalization it is much more easier to pull all countries into a one world
government where nations have given up all or parts of their sovereignty allowing the unions
collective choice to represent all member nations of the union.
And what if a member nations decides to resist going along with the rest of the union. They then
face significant economic disadvantages in terms of free trade and all the commercial benefits that come as part of the economic union with local countries.
The new world order economic system is clearly designed to capture all. [Emphasis added]
THE PROPHETICAL MEANING OF TEN
The Daniel 7:23-25, “He gave me this explanation: ‘The fourth beast is a fourth kingdom that will appear on earth. It will be different from all the other kingdoms and will devour the whole earth, trampling it down and crushing it. The ten horns are ten kings who will comefrom this kingdom. After them another king will arise, different from the earlier ones; he will subdue three kings. He will speak against the Most High and oppress his saints and try to change the set times and the laws. The saints will be handed over to him for a time,
times and half a time.”
The “ten horns” are explained in Daniel 7:23-25 and Revelation 17:12 to be ten kings, and the whole vision is of the last form of Gentile world-power, a confederated ten-kingdom empire, most likely covering the whole Earth. Now, it’s interesting to note, that on the year 1972, the Club of Rome proposed a plan to divide the whole world into 10 Regions. Could these 10 regions be the 10 Horns of the Bible? Now, the question arises is that who will
control these regions? Scholars have suggested that the Anti-Christ (Little Horn) would be in control of such regions. But what does the word of God say? Daniel 7:8, “While I was thinking about the horns, there before me was another horn, a little one, which came up among them; and three of the first horns were uprooted before it. This horn had eyes like the eyes of a man and a mouth that spoke boastfully.” Noticed that this ‘little horn’ is a man, and a very proud one. Therefore, could this man have total control of the whole world?
Furthermore, this proposed 10 regions will be divided into countries, or members belonging to their
particular regions. Below, you will find a comparison regarding the proposed 10 regions, and the current unions and proposed union for both political and economic union:
If we were to compare the first map with the newly born Communities (Unions) in the second map, we could find some discrepancies. Nevertheless, the discrepancies aren’t crucial. For example, the coming NAU (North American Union), which is theorized to be implemented in the next five years, started back in the days of NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) back in the 90′s, and now the government calls it the SPP (Security Prosperity Partnership), you can see that Mexico is not included in Fig.1, but it’s included in the proposed NAU. The reasons for such discrepancies could be due to the fact, that Fig.1 is a Map that goes back to the Cold War area, and lots of barriers were set in place: Example (Western Europe, Eastern Europe, South Africa). But now, that communism fell in the Soviet Union, the apartheid is over, well it’s full steam ahead for the kingdoms. Moreover, what does the word of God say about such Unions (Kingdoms)?
In Daniel 7:20-22, it speaks of a ‘little horn‘ coming out of the 10 Horns, who will speak boastfully against the Most High God. Moreover, some theologians have stated this ‘little horn’ signifies the Anti-Christ, who will wage war against the Saints. In fact, he was defeating the Saints, until the Ancient of Days came and pronounced judgement in favor of the saints on the Most High God, and thus the saints possessed the everlasting kingdom.
Moreover, in Daniel 7:26,“But the court will sit, and his power will be taken away and completely destroyed forever. Then the sovereignty, power and greatness of the kingdoms under the whole heaven will be handed over to the saints, the people of the Most High. His kingdom will be an everlasting kingdom, and all rulers will worship and obey him.”
As you can see God will conquered all the kingdoms (10 Horns) under the earth. The question arises, how will God accomplished this? Well, it will not be through peaceful means, but through war. In Revelation 19:11-21, it depicts our Lord and savior Jesus Christ, coming down from heaven with his heavenly Army to wage war against the Beast and his Kingdoms. It states the following: Revelation 19:11-21,“I saw heaven standing open and there before me was a white horse, whose rider is called Faithful and True. With justice he judges and makes war. His eyes are like blazing fire, and on his head are many crowns. He has a name written on him that no one knows but he himself. 13He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.
The armies of heaven were following him, riding on white horses and dressed in fine linen, white and clean. Out of his mouthcomes a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations. ‘He will rule them with an iron scepter’.” He treads the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty.
On his robe and on his thigh he has this name written:
KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS. And I saw an angel standing in the sun, who cried in a loud voice to all the birds flying in midair, ‘Come, gather together for the great supper of God, so that you may eat the flesh of kings, generals, and mighty men, of horses and their riders, and the flesh of all people, free and slave, small and great.’ Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and his army. But the beast was captured, and with him the false prophet who had performed the miraculous signs on his behalf. With these signs he had deluded those who had received the mark of the beast and worshiped his image. The two of them were thrown alive into the fiery lake of burning sulfur. The rest of them were killed with the sword that came out of the mouth of the rider on the horse, and all the birds gorged themselves on their flesh.”
As you can see from the above passage, our Lord and savior Jesus Christ, will come to defeat the Armies of earth in a final conflict, called the Battle of Armageddon. Therefore, the kingdom of God will be established on Earth, as we can see from Daniel 2:44-45,
“In the time of those kings, the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be destroyed, nor will it be left to another people. It will crush all those kingdoms and bring them to an end, but it will itself endure forever. This is the meaning of the vision of the rock cut out of a mountain, but not by human hands—a rock that broke the iron, the bronze, the clay, the silver and the gold to pieces.”
Therefore, the kingdom of God will be an everlasting one, that will never end”. Noticed that it states, in the times of those kings, we are living in such times. The 10 regions are awakening and yet few people realize it. This verse also speaks of a rock cut out of a mountain, but not by human hands. This ‘Rock’ is our Lord Jesus Christ, cut out of a mountain (God’s Kingdom), but not by human hands (Holy Spirit). Thus, this mountain will fill the whole Earth.THE NEW WORLD ORDER WILL FAIL!
In previous editions we have seen how man’s attempt to create a global government will be essentially a demonic influenced attempt to establish a New World Order in which the Middle East will become asignificant focal point. There are various schools of thought with some believing that a rebuilt Babylon in Iraq will become the centre of an International United Nations initiative whilst others believe that with the rebuilding of Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem that Jerusalem will become the capital of the New World Order.
However the key to understanding Armageddon is that as this New World Order is formed that not all
world regions will fully embrace it. This is one of the reasons why it is important to understand that when we speak of a New World Order we are referring to a political vision which historically rests on the aims and aspirations of the Bavarian Illumunati, ancient families of nobility that were positioned within Britain and mainland Europe who also then infiltrated the United States under the leadership of Albert Pike to ensure the United States also came under the control of powerful Masonic influences during the nineteenth century.
Whilst the Illuminati since the eighteenth century used the vehicle of freemasonry to extend it global
positioning outside of Europe and the United States, the truth remains that the end time vision of the global elite today is one which clearly favours the historical and geographical dominance of world power within networks that are more easily controlled by the Masonic families of power. This is why many prophecy scholars understand the importance of a United States of Europe in bible prophecy with some believing that the vision of the great image in Daniel 2 confirms a refocusing of world power within Europe before the second coming of Christ, hence continual focus on the growing power of the European Union and Mediterranean Union.
However, when it comes to the Islamic world where Islam has a deep hatred and mistrust of freemasonry (Islam clearly associates freemasonry/illuminati as “political Zionism”, a Western attempt to control the world and middle East using Israel as the key) and nations of the far east such as China, North Korea, Thailand whose political and historical ideologies are far different to the west, it should become obvious that trying to create a peaceful world government is filled with significant challenges when trying to pull in nations that have long resented the western world and its political ideals.
Evidence of this conflict of political ideology is one of the reasons why in October 2009 many of the
countries of the Middle East, South America and the Far East began discussions about setting up their
own international currency to compete against the USD as the dominant international currency. On
Tuesday 6th October 2009 a report was published in the UK Independent, confirming that the Arab
States, Russia and China had launched secret moves to stop using US currency for oil trading.
“In the most profound financial change in recent Middle East history, Gulf Arabs are planning along withThe United States was not party to these discussions in Hong Kong which also influenced Brazil and India to also voice their support for trading in non dollar oil payments. Ever since the Bretton Woods agreements - the accords after World War II which created the financial architecture for the world economy, the United States has dominated the global economy with the US dollar as the global reserve currency. It is now observable that with the global financial collapse of 2008 still being referred to an Anglo Saxon disaster in which Britain and the United States are seen as the culprits has renewed the focus of the emerging markets to seize control of world financial influence.
China, Russia, Japan and France to end dollar dealings for oil, moving instead to a basket of currencies
including the Japanese Yen, Chinese Yuan, the euro, gold and a new, unified currency planned for nations
in the Gulf Co-operation Council including Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait and Qatar.”
Once we understand this global dynamic between different world regions it makes it easier understanding why the bible clearly defines four major regional powers at the time of the fulfillment of the New World Order in which three of the regional powers will rebel and facilitate a series of actions that will lead to a major war which the bible terms the “Battle of Armageddon”
ADDITIONAL SUPPORT MATERIAL
Anti federalist groups, civil liberty groups, patriot groups and religious groups are
well aware of the migration to a one world government which will not only strip
countries of their own decision making ability but also drill down to the removal of
personal liberty and freedoms for the population.
Many new age movement advocates talk about the need for bloodshed to bring to
plan the one world government system and this is where the concept of Martial Law
becomes evident. Martial law is the concept used to crush rebellion by the people.
Source: http://www.globalreport2010.com/globalwatch16dec11.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment